We would all have stumbled upon our parents saying that “like causes produce like effects” ; a good deed will lead to a future beneficial effect while a bad deed will lead to a future harmful event”. So most of them intuit it to be a threat or some concept to daunt just like how the iron fisted man did to his citizens till his downfall. In unembellished terms, Karma has been compared to the Newton’s laws of cause and effect that says that every effect has a specific and predictable effect. This was regarded to be the universal law that could be applied in practical life. This concept of karma was then delineated with the Hindu and the Buddhism religions which I would like to voldemort now. It is also to be noted that Indian soteriologies (theories of salvation) posit that future births and life situations will be conditioned by actions performed during one’s present life—which itself has been conditioned by the accumulated effects of actions performed in previous lives. To what extent are these veracious? If so, let’s see if these concepts still operates invariably or appertains hardly to the mankind in this planet or karma itself nominates its own victims.
Latterly, I watched a Lebanese drama film directed by Nadine Labaki the CAPERNAUM. This movie portrays a 12 year old boy being afflicted by a sitch where he does not have any cromulent facilities and lack proper parenting. This is not just a movie, but the reality. There are many kids who suffer due to this disheartening condition.
In 2017, slightly less than 1 in 5 children lived in families with incomes below the federal poverty line, the lowest level since the Great Recession (2007–2009). Child poverty has generally decreased since 1960, falling from 27 to 18 percent of children in 2017, although the rate has risen during the Great Recession. In 2017, the proportion of children in poverty, by race/ethnicity, is highest among black and Hispanic children (29 and 25 percent, respectively, compared with 11 percent among white children). In 2017, children who lived in families headed by a single mother were much more likely to be poor than their counterparts living in families headed by a married couple (41 and 8 percent, respectively).
So from this let’s derive an apprehension on this ever questionable karma crap.
The children all over the world had underwent and is still undergoing this trauma by not even being able to enjoy their own childhood. In fact the mothers in these countries are unable to deliver their babies and infant mortality is occurring in greater rates due to the condition of the economic health of a nation. So let’s try to couple this condition with this concept called the karma.
Does that mean that these kids have enacted some bad deeds to have been brooking this? If yes, what could be the substantiation?
Or the respected soldiers dying for the nation and its people in a brutal war is because of the bad deed which he has done? At that point should he think about his disciplined and patriotic service or to the age old postulation called the karma? Who decides anybody’s end and to what extent does the term end mean? Is it just like the limits fixed for the success and failures which these people hit on to? What makes them to get arrested with these illusionary excerpts derived from the religions, as they say? A good for one seems to be a bad for the others, so how can this be concluded with one term called the KARMA? (Now here, I’m not trying to be vituperative with this postulate)
In this day and age, with the mushrooming upheavals and soaring headways, there is a steep intensity in the number of individualistic souls. By this, we have to comprehend that each soul leads a contrasting ball game where he has to act in an unequivocal mechanism for his own living and to pass that moment. So nobody can be left to face trivial circumstances. There can still be analysis held with how this karma is oriented with the religion and others.
Comments
Post a Comment